Indicators also external can understand what criteria individual types of capital of the site have been assessed the factors of a site are filled with indicators, i.e. they are described with facts and figures, to further increase their expressiveness. Using indicators remains transparent across the valuation basis for a site over the years and at any time can be compared with current evaluations. Despite still so comprehensive and detailed site analysis, there will be also planning and decision-making for the level of detail of the available indicators would be insufficient and therefore selected individual factors must be made the subject of extensive special analyses. “If but the location screen accurately aligned on certain aspects and zoomed” should be, while still at any time the systematic context remains preserved. In their reviews, measurements, effect relationships and evaluations, all factors should be kept consistently abstimmen capable. The computational analysis of numerous individual indicators will only bear fruit if it leads to code bundles, that makes sense to map location-relevant information.
Indicator sets have the task to explain the top figures of the system analysis regarding the factors they dimensioning. Indicator systems are thus particularly medium purpose relationships that are to derive from the planning system of the site. The most important element of the counter but remains his informative complicated facts in a concentrated form to quantify and use in relation to dynamic networks. Are the actors once favoring a coordinated strategy for the development of their site, they face the complex task that despite formulated vision to do so still no appropriate target evaluation exists. In this case the site without compass or appropriate feedback tools would go and therefore do not know how much of the path was already laid back and where exactly you can now actually stands.