A society that lives without commitment, ' ' without taste or interest. It has a depreciation of everything and all. He is a frivolous and negligent man who does not import more with nothing. Although to want ' ' to hug the world with mos' ' he is a man who does not obtain to fulfill to its tasks and commitments completely, but always to give to its jeitinho, as it says the common sense: ' ' the man always has one gambiarra' ' or ' ' jeitinho Brazilian of ser' '. That is, the man ' ' light' ' , either European or Brazilian it, always is worried in giving a skill in the things and not working them of systematic and complex form. She is an empty person and without goal, commitment, objectives. The only thing that interests to it is to have, to possess each time more. Desesperadamente it desesperadamente consumes, as it says the popular knowledge, ' ' it is as urubu in carnia' '.
It consumes because it is newness, because it is in fashion, because ' becomes it; ' part of sociedade' '. It is above all, a man who consumes because he is solitary and empty e, therefore, consumes to supply this necessity to become related, to have a style and an objective of life. It consumes because it thinks that such products can bring it happiness, but brings only one joy to it and/or a momentnea satisfaction. Result, sadness and repentance, therefore such product already does not satisfy it more, exactly that still he is new. It adopts for itself the culture of the dismissable one in which everything is dismissable also the proper man, the conjugal relationships, the ideology, justice, etc. Are somebody that wants to have each time more not mattering what it has that to make to arrive itself at such end.
To define legend, we appeal to the dictionaries. BLACKSMITH (2001, P. 453) affirms that the legend is part of the popular tradition, being ' ' narration of wonderful character, where the historical facts are deformed by the imagination of the people or poet, (…) fiction, fbula' ' , and LUFT (2001, p.420) complements with ' ' fabulosa history or liar, (…) mentira' '. We can affirm, therefore, that some characteristics of the myth and the legend if confuse, being both narratives. The first search explanation for that the man did not find, at the time of its sprouting, concepts that brought agreement; to understand second, we search Joo Alfredo de Freitas (apud Cascudo, 1965, PP 52-53), that he attributes to the little scientific knowledge of the people the distortion of facts, the great influence of the superstitions and, is concluded, to the sprouting of legends. They, perhaps, do not look the explanation of the sprouting of something, but they try to count what visa was heard or, being influenced for the fantasiosa mind or the fear.
Under this aspect, we can affirm that the historical context is factor of influence not only in the appearance of myths and legends, but in its maintenance: the fantasiosa mind is pledged in informing what it heard of others, in attractive way, and the details they need to arrest the attention of the reading listener//interlocutor: the grotesco appears in the narratives. Lewis affirms, in its workmanship a critical experiment in the literary one (2005), that, when we speak of myths (…) we are generally thinking about the best species and forgetting us the majority. If we will be behind all the myths of a people, probably we will be horrified with what we will go to read. Most of them, what it wants that they have meant for old or the wild ones, are, for we, meaningless and chocking; chocking not only for its cruelty and obscenity, but for its apparent dullness (…).
That specifically regulates the EULA: Limit the number of set of copies licensed, use of previous versions (downgrade), the use of different language versions (cross language), the right to transfer and transfer of licenses, etc. pur regulates the right to use products for corporate licenses. Quote the entire pur just does not make sense, we explain the general rules that need to be aware of when licensing. Much depends on what kind of product to which category he belongs, and on what channel license was purchased. Let us examine in more detail such a thing as the right to use the previous version (downgrade).
It should be clearly understood that most of this right extends to corporate licenses (OLP), and this right extends to the oem, but as stated above, only the operating system, and no more than one level down. Ie, instead of Windows Vista Business or Ultimate client can use Windows xp pro and, accordingly, instead of Windows xp pro client can use Windows 2000. The same and server operating systems: instead of Windows Sever 2008, you can use Windows Server 2003 R2. On the corporate license (OLP) step decrease downgrade is not limited and are not limited to product category, ie, having a license for Windows Vista, you can use Windows 95 instead of Office 2007 install Office xp. The only thing to consider when using the right downgrade – the version that you intend to use should only be installed from the original installation disk, it is a strict requirement of Microsoft.